is fun not alowed on this forum any more?

[finx]

whats the deal guys, cant we have a bit of fun buy having a grudge match topic ?
there has been some in the past with no issue so why now?
as spoonza said in his 1st post the point of it was so it was solid who's going to race who and people know which race's to keep an eye out for.

thanks
Ryan

[andw4t]

just read the grudge match topic, there seems nothing wrong with it to me, who cares if people are posting heaps of shite, it is a club and shite is what we talk really....and they are only talking about LEGAL racing in anticipation to nite wars, what is so wrong with that????

[johndoe1003]

also is kinda good if the shite talking is focoused on one topic? eg that 1? gives pepl a chance to have some fun and get each other a bit worked up (not in a angry way of course, thats stupid) before racing, so when it comes to the day, the competition is that much better.

[Fatman]

Premature lockage IMO

[kpr]

the grudge post, its been done before and never worked. i had a grudge against 5 others even one against myself! then look at stu he had one against all 467 members.
not one of these races happend. ok maybe me and stu have raced but thats about it. unless its done properly or goes in off topic. i dont see the point of it.
the old topic is here:

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1885&hilit=grudge

[andw4t]

well maybe people just want to talk racing/shite before they go down and race. who cares if they don't actually race really. don't see the point in locking the thread really. they are not post whoring, they are just being part of the club/organisation that they choose to belong to, and if they can't post within reason, then really, what is the point, might even scare people of the site

[finx]

agreed

[kpr]

thats what the offtopic is for?!.

i am going to create a spam topic in in off topic section. you can talk all the crap you like in this topic. it will be deleted each month. but any crap/spam anywhere else on the forum will be instant delete.

[finx]

sounds fair

[andw4t]

that seems like a better approach